WhisperBeat
WhisperBeat

AutoZone Q1 FY26 Postmortem: Miss, Cost Pressure Talk, and a -7% Session

AZOReport Date: 2025-12-09Before Market Open
Read original prediction

Results

Model:✔ Correct
Outcome (Actual/Expected)
Miss / Inline
Guidance (Actual/Expected)
Inline / Inline
Predicted Move
-3.5% down
Confidence
58%
Earnings Gap
-1.9%
Session Return
-7.2%
Final crowd results:

No votes recorded

1. Setup Recap

Original prediction (AZO, before the open): called for a downside reaction (low-to-mid single digits) driven by the risk that profit/margins and the message around costs would matter more than topline.

What the base case expected: not a disaster quarter, but a tape that punishes a miss in a high-priced defensive compounder.

Key evidence emphasis (from the preview framing): downside skew from expectations + sensitivity to cost/margin commentary.

2. Results vs Expectations

Reported results vs consensus:

  • EPS missed estimates (31.04 vs 32.03 expected).
  • Revenue slightly missed (4.63B vs 4.64B expected).

Guidance and management tone:

  • Management commentary emphasized cost pressure (tariff-driven) and continued pricing actions; not a “raised bar” message.

Qualitative surprises:

  • The combination of an EPS miss plus cost commentary left little reason for dip buyers to step in on day one.

3. Price Action & Scoreboard

Because this was before-the-open, the scoring window is: prior close → report-day open/close.

  • Pre-earnings close: 3766.96
  • Reaction-day open: 3694.89
  • Reaction-day close: 3496.77

Computed:

  • Earnings gap return: -0.01913 (down)
  • Session return: -0.07173 (down)

Scoreboard:

  • Opening gap direction vs prediction: matched (down).
  • Full-session direction vs prediction: matched (down).
  • Meaningful reversal: no — it opened lower and sold off further into the close.

4. Options, Flows & Example Structures

Options/vol:

  • No auditable post-print IV/skew in the captured sources; not grading vol crush.

Flows / positioning:

  • No clean short/borrow updates in-scope.

Example structures:

  • The specific structures from the prediction aren’t available in the captured sources; not grading individual spreads.

5. Hindsight on Reasoning & Weights

  • Fundamentals: the miss was real (EPS and revenue), and the tape treated it as enough to reprice.
  • Narrative: cost pressure mattered — the market didn’t need more proof once the quarter failed the “clean beat” standard.

Weight check:

  • Options/expectations downside skew was correctly weighted.
  • The move shows that “small miss” can still produce a large session in high-dollar compounders when the tape wants a reset.

6. Lessons & Playbook Updates

Ticker-specific:

  • AZO can translate a modest miss into an outsized session when cost commentary keeps uncertainty elevated.

Process tweak:

  • For expensive defensives, treat “miss + costs still rising” as a combo that often trends down all day (not just at the open).
Published: